Not too long ago, my wife and I had an opportunity to visit with another congregation. During one song, in a specific place, individuals in the audience let out a “hoot.” Although this did not violate my “comfort zone,” it did cause some reflection on my part.
Was there anything wrong with the “hoot”? I am not one of those folks who is bent out of shape by something different done elsewhere that is not practiced where I worship. So, I did not take Paul’s statement out of context and attempt to see the “hoot” as being a contradiction of 1 Corinthians 14:40, “Let all things be done decently and in order.”
My reflection was more along the lines of the future. Humans have a tendency to make a practice into a custom, a custom into a tradition, and a tradition into the law of God. What may have started out with meaning, often ends up being something we do, not from the heart, but from “that’s the way we have always done it.” It loses its original purpose and significance and digresses into an action done “because that’s what our parents and grandparents did.” Then, when someone questions it, or heaven forbid, wants to eliminate or change it in any way, their actions are considered heresy.
When Moses lifted up the brass serpent on a pole, there was a divine reason for it. Those bitten by snakes lived rather than died because they looked upon that brass serpent (Numbers 21:8-9). However, by the time of King Hezekiah, the purpose had changed (2 Kings 18:4). It had become an object of worship and needed to be destroyed. Imagine the alarm generated in the hearts of those who heard Hezekiah’s order. Many of those folks looked upon that object as something commanded by God, built by Moses, and which made it possible for many in that generation to exist because their ancestors were healed by the sight of it. It was no longer a creation by Moses for a past purpose, but had taken on a name and worship. It was Nehushtan. Strangely enough, the word translated means, “a piece of brass.” Yet, they worshiped it!When we look at 2 Kings 18:4, it makes us wonder how Israel could come to worship something which they called “a piece of brass.” Yet, are our motives for making traditions into the law of God anymore questionable?
Look at the laws some have made over the Lord’s supper.
- The fruit of the vine must be served in one container to the congregation. If the container is dropped or runs out prior to everyone being served, a larger one must be obtained and the serving started again from the beginning.
- The fruit of the vine must be fermented.
- The fruit of the vine must not be fermented.
- The unleavened bread must be made from wheat.
- Communion must be served prior to preaching.
- The bread must be served before the fruit of the vine.
- The bread must be broken by the one who presides prior to it being offered to the congregation.
- The communion must be served in an upper room.
- The Lord’s supper must be observed in the evening only – after 6 o’clock.
- The communion may be served to a congregation only once. A night time serving is unscriptural.
- When the Lord’s supper is being served, the congregation must observe silently as an act of reverence and/or respect.
- During the communion, there may be no other acts of worship performed, such as singing, praying silently, or reading one’s Bible.
- Those who serve on the table must wear suits and ties as a sign of respect or reverence.
- The elements must be covered with a table cloth prior to the elements being served.
- The table upon which the elements sit must be in front of the auditorium.
- The Sunday night serving of the Lord’s supper must be in the auditorium/sanctuary. They may not be dismissed to partake in another location.
- Only men may serve the congregation the Lord’s supper since this is a “male only” role. Allowing women to serve would be a violation of 1 Corinthians 14:34,35 and/or 1 Timothy 2:11-12.
- An announcement must be made to the assembly when the Lord’s supper is finished, that the collection to follow is not a part of the communion.
- In the prayer prior to the communion being served, the pattern or formula must be followed as given in Matthew 26:26-28; 1 Corinthians 11:24-25.
Yes, these and many other customs have found their way into law. Families have been torn apart due to religious differences on these matters.
My parting reflection is: Are any of these things the “good news” of Jesus Christ?
January 9, 2009 at 6:26 am
Hi Ray, great blog! Two questions I hope you can answer for me.
1) You mentioned not taking I Cor. 14:40 out of context…can you explain what the proper context of that scripture is as you see it?
2) Do you mind commenting on #17 in your points regarding the Lord’s Supper? It seems like the implication is that you don’t feel women serving the congregation is a violation of the verses you mentioned. Can you expand on that some?
Thanks in advance!
February 27, 2017 at 3:27 pm
I don’t check the comments very well, since I’m not too savvy on some aspects of WordPress. If I did not reply to your questions, send let me know, put your questions in the email, and I’ll attempt to reply. My email address is reayhawk@charter.net
January 9, 2009 at 1:45 pm
1. 1 Cor.14:40: the passage has been used to curtail or restrict things that Paul never had in mind. Usually, anything that we haven’t done before is wrong according to that passage. Multiple cups, Bible classes, women teaching classes, etc. According to the context it applied to prophets not speaking one at a time, tongue speakers speaking without an interpreter, and some women doing in the assembly what should be done at home.
2. The whole idea of the LS being served by men, who stand behind a table, at the front of the auditorium, and then serving the audience is not found in the Bible. Our assemblies are modeled more from a Catholic/Protestant tradition than they are from what is or is not described in the NT. The term “men’s role” is a creation of man more than being what the scriptures say. We have done it for so long that if you changed one iota, brethren would think the change would be blasphemy rather than changing a human creation. I remember when preaching in Mississippi in the late 50’s that the church bought new communion ware. The men decided to leave the table uncovered so we could see the new set. The lady who prepared communion saw the table uncovered and the entire family, which was influential, threw a hissy-fit. The table cloth went back on the table. It was now “scriptural.” I also remember when a congregation decided to have men come from the back of the auditorium and start serving from the back while others started serving from the front. Those in back were not among those who stood behind the table while prayers were being said prior to serving each element. Several threw one of those fits. “Unscriptural”! “Change agents” and several other statements were made. Those individuals thought scripture had been violated. The only thing violated was their human traditions which they had elevated to a “thus saith the Lord.” Probably 60%+ of our actions on Sunday morning are human traditions raised to the level of scripture. Of course, according to some, we do not teach or practice tradition, we teach and practice ONLY what the Bible teaches.
December 29, 2011 at 6:16 pm
Ray,
I know you wrote this some time ago, but what you’ve said here is quite true. We’ve allowed our traditions to become “law” and that’s both unfortunate and unscriptural. So then, who is it that ir really “taking liberties” with the scriptures: those who stick with what they call “the old paths”, which in reality are the old traditions, or those who refuse to make laws where God has made none?